The new data from the AI Anthropic startup can suffocate Gen Z fears concerning their future careers: companies use technology mainly to automate tasks, potentially compromising the quality and quantity of entry -level work.
The last of Anthropic Economic index report Published Monday found that 77% of companies using the company’s Claude software do so for automation purposes such as the “complete delegation of tasks”, while only 12% use technology for collaborative purposes such as learning. Anthropic has used data selected from one million transcriptions for programming applications for companies and software developers for its report.
The proliferation of task automation – mostly used for coding tasks, as well as for writing and teaching education – is probably the result of the two Robots of AI improves to accomplish tasks, as well as users who are more comfortable with technology, according to Peter McCRORY, responsible for the economy in Anthropic. For companies incorporating AI into their workplace, automation can help stimulate efficiency.
“Companies determine how to build the integrated infrastructure to unlock the effects of productivity,” said MCCRORY Fortune. “And there will probably be implications on the labor market as well.”
MCCRORY said the objective of the report is not to draw conclusions on the impact of AI on the labor market in the future. However, as AI automation tools become more easily available, the same goes for evidence of its impact on the future of work, especially for those who enter the labor market. A first of his kind study From the University of Stanford published last month, AI indications have a “significant and disproportionate impact on entry -level workers on the American labor market”, including a relative drop in relative employment of 13% for employees at the start of their career in the jobs most exposed to AI since companies have started to integrate technology in their workplaces.
The CEO of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, is well aware of the risks of this change on the Labor landscape. He warned in May that AI could Erase almost 50% of entry -level white collar work Over the next five years.
“Most of them do not know that it does not happen,” Amodei said Axios. “It seems crazy, and people just don’t believe it … We, as producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest on what will happen.”
The fears of the AI of generation Z, realize
For generation Z, the Fear of AI Out of their career path is already salient. According to a investigation By the Zety career platform of 1,000 workers from Gen Z, 65% of respondents said that a university diploma would not protect them from a job loss linked to the AI.
The concern of the generation concerning employment loss linked to AI is “on the right track,” said Christopher Stanton, Associate Professor of Business Administration at the Harvard Business School, said Fortune.
According to Stanton, the jobs will not be fully automated, but the tasks will do so, raising more questions about what is asked to employees, as well as the way they are trained. For example, a bot ai can be able to generate a marketing copy for an ad, but a writer or a publisher is always necessary to enter prompts and modify outings.
However, the automation of tasks will have a disproportionate impact on entry -level work in particular, said Stanton. The workplaces will begin to prioritize apprentice type experiences to train them, which will likely reach wages for these positions.
“You can imagine that AI does a large part of what entry-level workers did, but you still need these people to get a context,” he said. “You might imagine that their salary will fall so that they can accumulate experience.”
There is another change that Stanton can consider for young people: a transition to professions requiring physical work that AI is currently unable to do, such as professions. According to a Harris survey in 2024 ordered by Intuity Credit Karma, around 78% of Americans said they had noticed a Chléfaste of young people Continuing commercial jobs such as carpentry, electric work and welding.
“The revolution generating AI takes place much faster than the revolution of physical AI or robotics,” said Stanton.
Cashier or consultant?
It is still early to predict the impact of AI on the labor market with certainty, said Stanton, but there are a multitude of data indicating that when young people get a weak labor market, they can undergo long -term professional and financial consequences.
A 2016 historical study entitled “Cashier or consultant?“MEATED How the conditions of entry of the labor market had an impact on the salary of colleges graduates more than a decade after obtaining the diploma, using data from students from the diploma of 1974 to 2011. The study revealed that entry into the labor market for a recession was associated with a reduction of around 10% of the wages of the first year of employment, an effect which was mainly omnipresent after seven years. Majors like philosophy, they were more pronounced.
This drop in revenues for recession graduates could be due to the fact that to obtain a job, recent graduates find work at the lower end of the distributions of professional profits, such as working as barista or catering server, which pay less, but could be more easily available, said Stanton. Young budding professionals today do not try to join the labor market during a recession, but they enter a weak labor market, partly due to the evolution of the AI landscape. Consequently, there are unhappy parallels between the young generation Z which must sacrifice wages due to vacillating employment opportunities and graduate millennials in the great recession.
“At least, we have past empirical evidence that gives us a signal, where some recent university graduates have been historically very extreme for people’s careers,” said Stanton.
This story was initially presented on Fortune.com